Today my mum actually succeeded in cheering me up over dinner, doesnt happen everyday. Apart from that, i watched 2 shoujo animes recently..and being typical shoujo, they were both reverse harem, ie 1 female lead + a harem of male characters. I wonder why the female lead of a typical shoujo show always has to be a perfect girl while the male lead of a typical shounen show can slack off and be a nondescript loser and still have girls chasing after him. I mean it's easy to see why Hino(kiniro no corda) and Haruhi (Ouran High School) are so popular among guys, they are pretty, cute and kind. But why on earth would hot attractive girls fall for ppl like Shinji (NGE), Keitaro(Love Hina) and Junpei(Ichigo 100%)? It really reflects the mindset or ultimate fantasy of a typical japanese male(or any male actually) that no matter how loser-ish you are, there will still be hordes of horny yet innocent girls willing to get naked for you. And yes Im complaining about that because I cant find any decent male anime character to gush over, no matter what genre of anime Im watching. As a result, I always find myself gushing over and lusting after a female character and it just seems kind of wrong.
Anyway, I'm really grateful to whoever designed the Tea House theme of the Google homepage. It's so adorable that Im filled with love everytime I look at it =) Maybe it's my kind of fantasy, living a simple carefree life in a little hut by the river, eating wild fruits and serenading to little duckies..okay that's corny.
Anyway anyway, I was roaring with laughter at Scott Adams' Dilbert and the Way of the Weasel cause some of the things he said were so true. For instance, according to him there are two types of women: the one currently in discomfort, and the ones who are actively seeking it. The former would include women suffering from childbirth, menstrual cramp, headache, men and wearing bad shoes, and latter ie the voluntary pain seekers would be those who want to watch sad movies, imagine bad things that don't exist, pick fights with men over things the men didnt mean to say, and shop for uncomfortable shoes...In other words, the fundamental difference between men and women is women prefer pain and anguish while men seek comfort and pain only when it happens to other people (also known as entertainment).
He also states that the whole glass-ceiling problem in work is basically non existent and caused by women themselves, illustrating his point by posing a hypothetical survey question : If you could become CEO of a Fortune 500 company, and all you had to do to get there was kiss one thousand fat, white asses and never see your own children, would you do it?". According to him, 100% of women would say, "No thank you," whereas a healthy 30 % of men would say, "Let me get my business cards out of the car.", QED.
Some parts I really like/find useful
Training Your Boss to Accept Abuse
It's both fun and satisfying to verbally abuse your boss. But it's a bad career strategy unless you train him/her first. The trick is to start with tiny witticisms about a harmless aspect of your boss's personality and then expand from there. For example, if your boss likes fishing, you could insert harmless fish-related "jokes" into the meeting.
Boss: I think we have a big opportunity with this customer.
You: You mean big like that fish you allegedly caught? Ha ha!
It's not funny but neither will it end your career. It's just a test. If your boss smiles, then you can try to expand to new and bigger aspects of his dysfunctional personality.
Boss: You have an ugly task ahead of you.
You: That's because Im sitting across the table from you. Ha ha!
Your boss will think this good-natured ribbing is a sign that he's bonding with you. Bosses are funny that way. Using a version of weasel creep, you can continue to escalate the abuse.
Boss: Do you have those numbers I asked for?
You: No, you miserable piece of $#*!! Ha ha!!
Continue making your jokes until you get a look from your boss like this one...
(comic)
PHP: Before I eat a sandwich, I always remove the useless edges of the bread.
PHP: That tells you what kind of manager I am.
Asok: You're the anti-crust?
PHP: -_-
------
( more here )-----------
WDT (Weasel debating technique)
The traditional method for approaching an argument is to bring up relevant facts and weave them together in a logical framework. Unfortunately, that wont work against weasels because they use a superior debating method that involves conjuring up haullucinations, carefully arranging them in a tangled lump, and declaring victory. I recommend that you use this method too because the traditional method will only leave you frustrated. The weasel techniques are detailed below using a handy abbreviation and numbering system where WDT stands for weasel debating techniques. Feel free to use this shorthand at your next meeting, as in " Hey, wally, are you giving me a WDT3?"
WDT1. Restate your opponent's ideas using bizarre absolutes and then refute them, like this:
(comic)
Dilbert: We should add this feature to our product to make it more useful.
weasel: Are you telling me that not ONE person on earth will use our product without that feature?!!!
Dilbert: You changed what I said into a bizarre absolute.
Weasel: Oh, I change EVERYTHING you say?!!
WDT 2: Make comparisons to Hitler. This is a surprisingly flexible
technique because Hitler was a busy guy. He did everything from
eating to painting landscapes to attacking the world. So if someone
argues that napping is good for you, point out that Hitler liked
napping too.
WDT 3: Make a good point about an unrelated topic. For example, if
someone is arguing that airline travel is relatively safe, and you -
against all data - are arguing the other side, point out that
swimming is good exercise. When your opponent looks stunned and
sayd, "Yes, but...," cut him off in midsentence, declare victory, and
excuse yourself from the room.
WDT 4: Fill all the airtime to appear knowledgeable and eliminate the
opportunity for rebuttal.
(comic)
Dogbert: You can compensate your lack of knowledge by talking too much.
Dogbert: And dont be limited by society's expectation that you be interesting.
PHP: Sometimes I like to sit quietly and think up ideas.
Dogbert: Nothing good can come from that.
WDT 5: Accuse your opponent of being insensitive. This method works
because it's always true. I'm willing to bet that even conjoined
twins complain that the other is insensitive, e.g., "You don't know
what it's like to be the head on the left!"
WDT 6: For every respectable human quality there is an insulting word
that means the same thing. For example, accuse open-minded people of
being flakes. Accuse cautious people of being afraid of change...
PHP: Dont be afraid of change.
Employee: You're right! Im going to get gender change operation and move to China!
*employee lefts*
*PHP sits stunned*
Wally: I've always wondered what would happen if someone listened to you.
WDT 7: Add weight to your opinions by invoking the opinions of
unnamed multitudes, as in "Everyone agrees with me." A weasel
defines EVERYONE as at least one other weasel.
PHP: Ming, everyone says our web site is ugly.
Ming: Really? Every person on earth said that?
Even the Tibetan Monks?
PHP: Maybe it was just one person.
Ming: And you confused him with the whole planet?
WDT 8: The tax code is a valuable debating tool for weasels because
it's too complicated to understand. That means you can refer to the
tax code to support any argument. I can't tell you how many times
weasels have - with straight faces - suggested I invest in money-
losing ventures so that I can get valuable tax write-offs.
Apparently the theory is that the more money I lose the better off I
will be.